Davies and Croft both made half-centuries in a 109-run partnership. |
Four of Lancashire’s batsmen struck
half-centuries, including Karl Brown (59) Ashwell Prince (57) Alex Davies (53)
and Steven Croft (51), guiding the visitors to a respectable score of 300/8
after winning the toss and choosing to bat first.
In reply, Derbyshire were bowled out for
199 as Lancashire achieved victory with just under ten overs to spare, with Wayne
White (4-33) and Tom Bailey (3-41) inflicting considerable damage to the Derby
run-chase.
Derbyshire proved to be second-best on this
occasion, but Tony Palladino will feel pleased with his efforts, claiming 5-49
to ensure that none of the Lancashire batsmen progressed further after reaching
half-centuries.
Usman Khawaja and Prince gave Lancashire a
sturdy start as they reached 46 before losing their first wicket. Khawaja (31) played
well before he edged behind off Mark Footit, but this minor setback was followed
by a 64-run partnership between Prince and Brown for the second-wicket.
Brown’s one-day form has been integral to
the Lightning’s success this season and he led the Lancashire innings with
another confident performance, ably assisted by Prince before the South-African
was bowled by David Wainwright (1-58).
Runs continued to flow for the visitors
with another fifty partnership, this time between Brown and captain, Paul
Horton (19) but the loss of two wickets for five runs led to Lancashire falling
to 170/4, as Palladino removed both batsmen.
Both Croft and Davies were new to the
crease and started with caution, but the pair began to accelerate in a stand
worth 109 runs. Of the two batsmen, many would have expected Croft to take the initiative
but it was in fact Davies who showed the first signs of aggression.
The young keeper-batsman played a series of
positive strokes and compounded Derbyshire’s misery with some excellent running
between the wickets as he reached his half-century in just 38 balls.
Croft followed this example, smashing Wes
Durston for consecutive sixes to propel him towards a 40-ball fifty of his own.
A score of more than 300 seemed possible with these two going strong, but the
loss of four wickets for 21 runs restricted Lancashire’s progress towards the
back-end of the innings.
Nevertheless, a target of 301 was likely to
be tough for Derbyshire with the light deteriorating throughout their innings.
The hosts had, previously, given a good account of themselves in this format
with the bat, but Wayne Madsen’s 49 proved to be the highlight of an otherwise
unconvincing performance.
Playing in only his second List A match for
Lancashire, Bailey struck an important breakthrough with the final ball of his
second over to remove Wes Durston for just two, as the opener was trapped leg
before in front of the stumps.
Bailey claimed another wicket soon after to
remove Scott Elstone, also for two runs, this time edging behind to Davies, who soon claimed another catch as Jordan Clark collected the first of two
wickets to dismiss Billy Godleman for 23, with Derbyshire struggling at 66/3.
The partnership between Madsen and Marcus
North needed to be a substantial one if the hosts were to turn the match
around, but the pair could only add another 27 runs before White claimed the
first of four wickets to remove North for just eight.
Having scored successive centuries in the
first two matches of this campaign, Madsen possessed the potential to revive
Derbyshire’s run-chase, but White had other ideas, forcing him to play the ball
straight to Brown with the score at 101/5.
Alex Hughes added 47 and former
Lancastrian, Gareth Cross hit a quick 20 as the pair made 54 for the
sixth-wicket, but when these two were dismissed Lancashire found themselves
amongst the tail-enders.
With Tom Taylor injured earlier in the
match, Derbyshire only had ten batsmen and their tenacity with the bat soon
faded in the knowledge that their chances were becoming very slim.
White and Bailey came back strong at the
end of the innings to seal an important victory for the visitors, keeping their
hopes of qualification intact.
No comments:
Post a Comment